<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Chocolate delivery</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sugoodsweets.com/blog/2005/03/chocolate-delivery/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sugoodsweets.com/blog/2005/03/chocolate-delivery/</link>
	<description>Dessert should be good for you</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2011 05:34:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Su Good Eats &#187; Michel Cluizel: Chocolate with a missing ingredient</title>
		<link>http://www.sugoodsweets.com/blog/2005/03/chocolate-delivery/#comment-304</link>
		<dc:creator>Su Good Eats &#187; Michel Cluizel: Chocolate with a missing ingredient</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2006 21:29:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sugoodsweets.com/blog/2005/03/31/chocolate-delivery/#comment-304</guid>
		<description>[...] The first bar I sampled came from the Tamarina plantation in Sao Tome. At 70% cocoa solids (the upper limit for most people), this chocolate was the strongest of the bunch. It had an earthy flavor like my favorite chocolate, the Valrhona 70% Guanaja. There were notes of orange and raisin. Then it turned acidic, making the flavor unrefined. Since I&#8217;m not an expert at describing flavors, I&#8217;ll include the package description: &#8220;It expresses notes of a fertile, volcanic marine soil, which blend, in a superbly lingering delight, with subtle, grassy and liquorice aromas.&#8221; It was apparent that the chocolate didn&#8217;t have emulsifiers, as I had to coax it with my tongue to make it melt. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The first bar I sampled came from the Tamarina plantation in Sao Tome. At 70% cocoa solids (the upper limit for most people), this chocolate was the strongest of the bunch. It had an earthy flavor like my favorite chocolate, the Valrhona 70% Guanaja. There were notes of orange and raisin. Then it turned acidic, making the flavor unrefined. Since I&#8217;m not an expert at describing flavors, I&#8217;ll include the package description: &#8220;It expresses notes of a fertile, volcanic marine soil, which blend, in a superbly lingering delight, with subtle, grassy and liquorice aromas.&#8221; It was apparent that the chocolate didn&#8217;t have emulsifiers, as I had to coax it with my tongue to make it melt. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lynn</title>
		<link>http://www.sugoodsweets.com/blog/2005/03/chocolate-delivery/#comment-30</link>
		<dc:creator>Lynn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2005 10:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sugoodsweets.com/blog/2005/03/31/chocolate-delivery/#comment-30</guid>
		<description>Nice brother!  When&#039;s your birthday?  Are you an Aries too?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice brother!  When&#8217;s your birthday?  Are you an Aries too?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

